Andrew Colborn says Netflix ruined his life. As a sheriff’s sergeant, he assisted convict a murderer in 2007. Tens of millions watched, the show won four Emmys, and Mr. Colborn became infamous.
Before “Making a Murderer” aired, A bing search of their name “would have revealed two nondescript news articles about routine neighborhood crime,” he alleges in case.
Now it arises hundreds of thousands. He and their family members have obtained violent threats that “fill the capability of 28 cds,” the lawsuit claims. (Mr. Colborn, whom retired in 2018, declined a meeting request.)
Netflix has made a push that is major original documentaries. Lisa Nishimura, who oversees the effort, has stated the company’s objective is to “create a moment that is cultural and “allow visitors to enter a distinct experience to aid us try to better understand the planet around us all.” In 2018 Barack and Michelle Obama cut a production that is multiyear with Netflix, and Mr. Obama stated last year that their productions would touch “on issues of competition and course, democracy and civil liberties.”
“Making a Murderer” may be the streaming giant’s most famous documentary. I examined a huge number of pages of courtroom transcripts, police reports along with other public records. They leave small question that the series is dishonest. Examples abound of selectively modified footage and omission or distortion of key points.
“Making a Murderer” is particularly egregious, nonetheless it’s section of a broader campaign by Netflix against police plus in help of modern factors. ...